yeah, it's really a terrible time, when we pursuit love and peace instead of war...I'd suggest starting another crusade soon to make it all better... (sarcastic mode off) What I cannot understanmd, is why they should be concerned about little boys. The books- at least the aforementioned X-Men title- is for teen audience and up, not fo all ages. It kind of remembered me of the time a mother arugued about another comic book title, that the led female character- a former slave - was too open minded concerning the men she slept with, and didn't felt like being nto a stable relationship yet because she didn't wnat to feel like she was property of someone else again. This mum argued that, after SHE GAVE HER DAUGHTER THE BOOK, she had to expalin to her 7 years daughter (seven. years.old. daughter) why the lead character was so "free" concerning the men she was sleeping with, and asked the publishers to change route, but then again: on the cover, it was displayed more than once, and with quite big fonts, that the book was TEEN +. And she made it read to her 7 years old daughter. Now, publishers, especially cmonic books one, still remember the yuears of the comic book authority, remember when comic books were tagged as a way to teach children dirrespectufulness and so on. they rember tickets by governemnts and reprimandations by the CBA. Thta's why they are careful enough to dispoly sensitive topic in adeguate books, and it's up to the parents knowing what it's better for the child. nevertheless, they try to teach acceptance even through comic books characrter, but this doesn't mean the childrne will suddnely emulate them as well in the sexual department. shockjing how still nowadays people is little-minded.
no subject
What I cannot understanmd, is why they should be concerned about little boys. The books- at least the aforementioned X-Men title- is for teen audience and up, not fo all ages. It kind of remembered me of the time a mother arugued about another comic book title, that the led female character- a former slave - was too open minded concerning the men she slept with, and didn't felt like being nto a stable relationship yet because she didn't wnat to feel like she was property of someone else again. This mum argued that, after SHE GAVE HER DAUGHTER THE BOOK, she had to expalin to her 7 years daughter (seven. years.old. daughter) why the lead character was so "free" concerning the men she was sleeping with, and asked the publishers to change route, but then again: on the cover, it was displayed more than once, and with quite big fonts, that the book was TEEN +. And she made it read to her 7 years old daughter.
Now, publishers, especially cmonic books one, still remember the yuears of the comic book authority, remember when comic books were tagged as a way to teach children dirrespectufulness and so on. they rember tickets by governemnts and reprimandations by the CBA. Thta's why they are careful enough to dispoly sensitive topic in adeguate books, and it's up to the parents knowing what it's better for the child.
nevertheless, they try to teach acceptance even through comic books characrter, but this doesn't mean the childrne will suddnely emulate them as well in the sexual department.
shockjing how still nowadays people is little-minded.